... | @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ For example, on a 2011 macbook pro, rendering (no downloads, everything cached) |
... | @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ For example, on a 2011 macbook pro, rendering (no downloads, everything cached) |
|
* Safari: html: 1450ms, svg:~1000ms, mathml: ~300ms
|
|
* Safari: html: 1450ms, svg:~1000ms, mathml: ~300ms
|
|
* Firefox: html: ~3300ms, svg:~2400ms, mathml:~880ms
|
|
* Firefox: html: ~3300ms, svg:~2400ms, mathml:~880ms
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
### Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safari SVG output is already close to the performance of Firefox Native MathML. But it's hard to judge the 300ms for Safari's MathML since that implementation is incomplete -- it's easy to be fast if you're not doing the job. However, in Safari's defense, the page is within the range of its abilities.
|
|
Safari SVG output is already close to the performance of Firefox Native MathML. But it's hard to judge the 300ms for Safari's MathML since that implementation is incomplete -- it's easy to be fast if you're not doing the job. However, in Safari's defense, the page is within the range of its abilities.
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |