... | @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This page documents an experiment to [[Improve loading behavior]]: building a si |
... | @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This page documents an experiment to [[Improve loading behavior]]: building a si |
|
|
|
|
|
## Word of caution
|
|
## Word of caution
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strictly speaking, it is neither possible nor desirable to build a single-file version of MathJax. Not possible, because MathJax is not just JavaScript (but also fonts and images). Not desirable because it extremely unlikely that the reader will need to load *all* of MathJax -- all inputs, all outputs, all extensions, all fonts in all formats, all locales etc.
|
|
1. **This is experimental.** Of course, MathJax is its usual self but there might be other problems that have not shown up in testing yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That being said, there are situations where a developer might prefer a single file built (e.g. on mobile apps where the developer has tight control over the reader's options and wants to consciously limit them).
|
|
2. Strictly speaking, it is neither possible nor desirable to build a single-file version of MathJax. Not possible, because MathJax is not just JavaScript (but also fonts and images). Not desirable because it extremely unlikely that the reader will need to load *all* of MathJax -- all inputs, all outputs, all extensions, all fonts in all formats, all locales etc. That being said, there are situations where a developer might prefer a single file built (e.g. on mobile apps where the developer has tight control over the reader's options and wants to consciously limit them).
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Tools
|
|
## Tools
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |