STIX-feedback.md

-* In STIX-Math, some glyphs used as components for stretchy operators should be moved to the Miscellaneous Technical unicode block. This includes those from uni2320.s1 to uni23B3.s1 and from uni23B7.s1 to uni23B9.s1
+* In STIXMath-Regular.otf, some glyphs used as components for stretchy operators should be moved to the Miscellaneous Technical unicode block. This includes those from uni2320.s1 to uni23B3.s1 and from uni23B7.s1 to uni23B9.s1
 
 * There are a couple of delimiters that could be made infinitely stretchy (but they have only fixed size data):
     U+203E could be able to stretch infinitely (using itself as the extender)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 * STIX-Word is missing glyphs from STIX-General?
 
-* Are most of the glyphs from STIX-Main and STIX-Math duplicate? If so, is it ok not to repeat them in the Web fonts splitting? Can the STIX committee merge the two files?
+* Are most of the glyphs from STIX-Regular.otf and STIXMath-Regular.otf duplicate? If so, is it ok not to repeat them in the Web fonts splitting? Can the STIX committee merge the two files?
 
 * Do we have duplicate glyphs for style vs mathvariant (for example alphabets from STIX-Bold.otf and the corresponding characters from the Mathematical Alpha Num block of STIX-Regular.otf)? If so, is it ok not to repeat them in the Web fonts splitting?