|
|
|
* In STIX-Math, some glyphs used as components for stretchy operators should be moved to the Miscellaneous Technical unicode block. This includes those from uni2320.s1 to uni23B3.s1 and from uni23B7.s1 to uni23B9.s1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* There are a couple of delimiters that could be made infinitely stretchy (but they have only fixed size data):
|
|
|
|
U+203E could be able to stretch infinitely (using itself as the extender)
|
|
|
|
U+222B could be made infinitely stretchy (top: U+2320, rep: U+23AE, bot: U+2321)
|
|
|
|
U+27E6 and U+27E7 could be infinitely stretchy using box drawing characters (U+2553, U+2551, U+2559, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Other stretchy operators could be added, see the DELIMITERS list in https://github.com/fred-wang/MathJax-dev/blob/open-type-fonts/fonts/OpenTypeMath/STIX-Web/config.py
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* STIX-Word is missing glyphs from STIX-General?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Are most of the glyphs from STIX-Main and STIX-Math duplicate? If so, is it ok not to repeat them in the Web fonts splitting? Can the STIX committee merge the two files?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Do we have duplicate glyphs for style vs mathvariant (for example alphabets from STIX-Bold.otf and the corresponding characters from the Mathematical Alpha Num block of STIX-Regular.otf)? If so, is it ok not to repeat them in the Web fonts splitting? |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
