Mathjax-v2.2-feature-discussion.md

@@ -93,7 +93,11 @@ fredw: We will only consider STIX (and perhaps Asana) support in the list below.
 
 * incorporate Davide's amscd code. See [issue 420](https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax/issues/420)
 * investigate a LaTeX2e extra symbols extension. 
-* offer instiki syntax as input -> **not a priority** (instiki never exposes its TeX syntax but converts to MathML). fred: actually instiki just uses itex2MML and I think has an option to use blahtex. Both tools are open source so the syntax is known. peter: true but we should probably open up another section for "input processors"? fred: it's probably overkill to implement input processors for itex2MML or blahtex. They basically rely on the same LaTeX-like syntax as MathJax TeX input processor. Extensions to add LaTeX commands that are specific to these languages and not included in the default TeX input Jax sound more appropriate. peter: good point. I was also thinking about possibly different syntax, say maple, but that's out of the scope anyway. fred: OK, I was really only talking about instiki here (I guess it does not support maple), but opening a section for other input processor too is fine. I haven't seen requests from users for other input processors, though.
+* offer instiki syntax as input -> **not a priority** (instiki never exposes its TeX syntax but converts to MathML). 
+
+  fred: actually instiki just uses itex2MML and I think has an option to use blahtex. Both tools are open source so the syntax is known. peter: true but we should probably open up another section for "input processors"? fred: it's probably overkill to implement input processors for itex2MML or blahtex. They basically rely on the same LaTeX-like syntax as MathJax TeX input processor. Extensions to add LaTeX commands that are specific to these languages and not included in the default TeX input Jax sound more appropriate. peter: good point. I was also thinking about possibly different syntax, say maple, but that's out of the scope anyway. fred: OK, I was really only talking about instiki here (I guess it does not support maple), but opening a section for other input processor too is fine. I haven't seen requests from users for other input processors, though.
+
+  fredw: So as I read it on the [Instiki](http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/wiki/instiki/show/Markup+Choices) documentation, the only supported syntax for equations are itex2MML and blahtex and as I said they are Open Source. So the work to do would be to verify if all their LaTeX commands are available in MathJax and add extensions if necessary.
 
 ### MathML support