Issues #441 (closed) and #783 (closed) fixed support for const __FlashStringHelper* but it's broken again.
"100% code coverage" is meaningless if it doesn't cover all of the features, so here are some tests for it.
Issues #441 (closed) and #783 (closed) fixed support for const __FlashStringHelper* but it's broken again.
"100% code coverage" is meaningless if it doesn't cover all of the features, so here are some tests for it.