adox/adcx decode table entries are wrong?
Created by: khuey
#2615 (closed) added adox/adcx support. Both instructions take two operands and store to the first operand. Since the first operand is both a source and a destination, shouldn't the table entries be
{OP_adox, 0xf338f618, "adox", Gy, xx, Gy, Ey, xx, mrm, (fWO|fRO), END_LIST},
{OP_adcx, 0x6638f618, "adcx", Gy, xx, Gy, Ey, xx, mrm, (fWC|fRC), END_LIST},
rather than what's there today
{OP_adox, 0xf338f618, "adox", Gy, xx, Ey, xx, xx, mrm, (fWO|fRO), END_LIST},
{OP_adcx, 0x6638f618, "adcx", Gy, xx, Ey, xx, xx, mrm, (fWC|fRC), END_LIST},
?